欢迎访问新加坡聚知刊出版有限公司官方网站
info@juzhikan.asia
The Washback Effect: A Literature Review
  • ISSN:3041-0843(Online) 3041-0797(Print)
  • DOI:10.69979/3041-0843.26.01.054
  • 出版频率:Quarterly Publication
  • 语言:English
  • 收录数据库:ISSN:https://portal.issn.org/ 中国知网:https://scholar.cnki.net/journal/search

The Washback Effect: A Literature Review 
Meng Xing

School of English Studies Xian International Studies UniversityXian Shaanxi China710000

Abstract:This review examines the theoretical development and empirical research on the washback effect, the influence of testing on teaching and learning. It traces its conceptual evolution since Alderson and Wall’s (1993) washback hypothesis, outlining key dimensions such as direction, intensity, specificity, and scope. Findings reveal washback as a complex, context-dependent process mediated by teacher cognition, learner agency, and digital assessment. Contemporary research increasingly links washback to issues of equity, ecological validity, and technology. The review concludes by emphasizing the need for stakeholder collaboration and critical reflection to foster assessment that supports meaningful and equitable learning.

Keywords: washback effect; language testing; language teaching and learning

References

[1] Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 115–129.

[2] Bailey, K. M. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing, 13(3), 257–279.

[3] Bailey, K. M. (1999). Washback in language testing. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

[4] Cheng, L. (2005). Changing language teaching through language testing: A washback study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[5] Cheng, L., & Curtis, A. (Eds.). (2010). Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods. London: Routledge.

[6] Choi, I.-C. (2008). Washback of a national English test in Korea. Language Testing, 25(1), 3–31.

[7] Doe, C., & Smith, J. (2024). Remote proctoring and its washback on learner anxiety and test preparation strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(1), 123–140.

[8] Gamlem, S. M., & Smith, K. (2023). Student voice in assessment: Co-designing for sustainable washback in secondary schools. The Curriculum Journal, 34(3), 432–450.

[9] Green, A. (2007). Washback to learning outcomes: A study of IELTS preparation courses. Cambridge ESOL Research Notes, 28, 3–9.

[10] Green, A. (2013). Washback in language assessment. In A. J. Kunnan (Ed.), The companion to language assessment (pp. 792–817). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

[11] Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[12] Lee, Y.-J., & Butler, Y. G. (2023). The ecology of washback: An ecological perspective on how tests influence teaching. Language Teaching Research, 27(4), 567–589.

[13] López, A. A., & Turkan, S. (2024). Washback in workplace language assessment: A framework for integrated language and professional skills evaluation. Language Assessment Quarterly, 21(2), 145–168.

[14] Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13(3), 241–256.

[15] Pan, Y.-C. (2009). Test impact in Taiwan: Linking washback and test validity. Language Testing, 26(1), 27–62.

[16] Pan, Y.-C., & Newfields, T. (2012). Washback of university entrance exams in Taiwan. Asia-Pacific Education Review, 13(1), 1–14.

[17] Popham, W. J. (1987). The merits of measurement-driven instruction. Phi Delta Kappan, 68(9), 679–682.

[18] Qi, L. (2005). Stakeholders’ conflicting aims undermine washback. Language Testing, 22(2), 142–173.

[19] Saville, N., & Hawkey, R. (2004). The IELTS impact study. IELTS Research Reports, 4, 1–28.

[20] Schissel, J. L., & De Korne, H. (2023). Washback for justice? Language assessment, social justice, and decolonial options. Applied Linguistics, 44(3), 450–470.

[21] Shih, C.-M. (2007). New test, old pedagogy: Teacher resistance to communicative washback in Taiwan. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 4(1), 107–132.

[22] Shohamy, E. (2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. London: Longman.

[23] Spolsky, B. (1985). Language testing and assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[24] Spratt, M. (2005). Washback and the classroom: The implications for teaching and learning. Language Teaching Research, 9(1), 5–29.

[25] Tsagari, D. (2016). Investigating washback in EFL assessment. System, 56, 17–28.

[26] Tsagari, D., & Cheng, L. (2017). Washback, impact, and consequences revisited. Language Testing, 34(4), 471–479.

[27] Tsagari, D., & Cheng, L. (2023). Teacher assessment literacy and its role in mediating washback: A longitudinal study in exam-oriented contexts. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 30(2), 189–212.

[28] Wall, D. (2012). Washback and impact. In C. Coombe, P. Davidson, B. O’Sullivan, & S. Stoynoff (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language assessment (pp. 79–88). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[29] Watanabe, Y. (1996). Does grammar translation come from the entrance examination? Language Testing, 13(3), 318–333.

[30]Watanabe, Y. (2004). Teacher factors mediating washback. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 129–146). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

[31]Xie, Q. (2021). Modeling washback chains: Linking teacher cognition, instructional practice, and learner performance in high-stakes testing contexts. Language Testing, 38(2), 261–285.

[32]Yan, X., & Fan, J. (2024). Digital washback in the era of AI: How automated writing evaluation shapes feedback practices. Computers & Education, 208, 104556.

[33]Zhang, R., & Chen, M. (2025). Learning analytics and personalized washback: A data-driven intervention model for formative assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73(1), 205–229.