
info@juzhikan.asia
School of English Studies Xi'an International Studies University,Xi’an Shaanxi China,710000;
Abstract:As a multimodal discourse, movie posters are not only an important promotional method for distributors but also one of the ways for audiences to obtain information about films. Based on Halliday’s systemic-functional grammar and Kress and Leeuwen’s visual grammar, this paper takes the American promotional poster of the movie Green Book as an example to explore the foregrounding features of modalities such as language, image, color and typography, as well as the significance of the relationships among modalities for the overall construction of the multimodal text of movie posters. As a practice of multimodal stylistic theory, it is expected that this paper can provide further verification for multimodal stylistic theory and offer useful references for more people to read and understand multimodal texts such as movie posters.
Keywords: Multimodal stylistic analysis; Systemic-Functional grammar; Visual grammar; Movie poster; Green Book
References
[1] Kress, G.R. & Leeuwen, T. V. (1996). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Image. London: Routledge.
[2] Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (2002). Colour as a semiotic mode: notes for a grammar of colour. Visual Communication, 1(3), 343-368.
[3] Leeuwen, T. V. (2005). Typographic meaning. Visual Communication, 4(2), 137-143.
[4] Li, Z. (2003). A Social Semiotic Analysis of Multimodal Discourse. Foreign Language Studies, (5), 1-8+80.
[5] Lei Xi, Zhang Delu. (2015). A Multimodal Stylistic Comparison of Two Cover Versions for Graham Greene's Collage Novel The Women's World. Contemporary Foreign Language Studies, (9), 20-26, 76-77.
[6] Norgaard, N. Beatrix, B. & Rocio, M. (2010). Key Terms in Stylistics. London and New York: Continuum.
[7] Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Towards a semiotics of typography. Information Design Journal, 14(2), 139-155.
[8] Zhang, D. (2009). Exploring a Comprehensive Theoretical Framework for Multimodal Discourse Analysis. Chinese Foreign Language, (1), 24-30.