Digital intelligence empowers the ontology of mechanical professional education evaluation
Xuan Yuke

Qinhuangdao Polytechnic Institute，Hebei Province Qinhuangdao City,066000；

Abstract: The rapid development of digital intelligence technology is reshaping the underlying logic of vocational education evaluation. Mechanical professional education, in particular, faces a profound conflict between technical rationality and humanistic values. Starting from the crisis in educational evaluation triggered by the technological revolution, this paper reveals how algorithmic scoring systems dissolve educational subjectivity, how sensor data flows disenchant the embodied knowledge of craftsmen, and how digital twin technology challenges the practicality of teaching practices. Through ontological reconstruction, this paper proposes a shift from an "entity ontology" to a relational ontology evaluation system characterized by the synergistic evolution of "Human-Technology-Environment". This paper calls for building an awakened educational future, cultivating "Digital Craftsmen" who possess both intelligent control capabilities and humanistic care, thereby achieving the dialectical unity of technological empowerment and the preservation of humanity.

Keywords: Vocational Education; Digital Intelligence Empowerment; Educational Evaluation; Ontological Reconstruction

References

[1]Yu Liang, Deng Shuangjie, Zhang Xinyue. The Evolution, Internal Logic, and Development Trends of Artificial Intelligence Technology Empowering Education [J]. E-education Research, 2025, 46(06): 13-20+28. DOI:10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2025.06.002.

[2] Su Qimin, Tao Yanqin. The Myth, Risks, and Imaginative Reconstruction of the Concept of "Educational Evaluation" in the Era Empowered by Digital Intelligence Technology [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2025, 43(06): 38-49. DOI:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2025.06.003.
[3] Qi Zhanyong, Li Lu. Potential Risks and Regulations of Digital Empowerment in Vocational Education Evaluation Reform——An Investigation Based on Risk Society Theory [J]. Vocational Education Forum, 2025, 41(05): 32-45.

[4] Gao Yifei, Wang Shunan, Long Baoxin. The Characteristics, Risks, and Solutions of Educational Evaluation in the Digital Intelligence Era [J/OL]. Teaching and Administration, 1-6 [2025-07-04]. 

[5] Zhang Rui, Xie Yanping. The Value Representation, Logical Framework, and Practical Path of Digitally Empowered Evidence-Based Classroom Teaching Evaluation [J]. Modern Education Management, 2025, (04): 79-89. DOI:10.16697/j.1674-5485.2025.04.007.

[6] Li Ming, Yang Wenling, Deng Sen, et al. The Digital Transformation of Vocational Education Teaching Evaluation: Technological Logic, Problem Orientation, and Practical Path [J]. Vocational Education Forum, 2025, 41(03): 65-72.

[7] Zhu Dequan, Zhang Jingwei. Chinese-style Modernization: The Discourse Logic and Practical Path of Educational Evaluation Reform in the New Era [J]. Modern Education Management, 2025, (01): 13-23. DOI:10.16697/j.1674-5485.2025.01.002.

[8] Zheng Yonghe, Wang Yiyan, Yang Shuhao. Artificial Intelligence Empowering Educational Evaluation: Value, Challenges, and Paths [J]. Open Education Research, 2024, 30(04): 4-10. DOI:10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2024.04.001.

[9] Yang Zhi, Song Wanju. The Transformation of Science Education Evaluation in the United States: Challenges and Responses [J]. Chemistry Education (Chinese and English), 2024, 45(15): 119-123. DOI:10.13884/j.1003-3807hxjy.2014090019.

[10] Lu Luping, Chen Yuanyuan. The Value Logic and Optimization Path of Digital Empowerment in Vocational Education Evaluation [J]. Education and Vocation, 2024, (07): 50-57. DOI:10.13615/j.cnki.1004-3985.2024.07.009.